From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Gnat: broken dispatch tables for interface types ?
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:31:03 +0200
Date: 2012-07-09T09:31:03+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1x0xui2k9bjoi.acdcm0afix9u.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: acd97580-e0cd-4ed9-9b66-026019da503d@googlegroups.com
On Sun, 8 Jul 2012 23:53:42 -0700 (PDT), rodakay@internode.on.net wrote:
> Here is the 'cut down' code which shows the problem ...
I see nothing wrong with dispatching tables. Though the code much too large
and complicated for a small example.
One thing though is that you should not derive new tagged types in bodies.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-09 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-08 3:02 Gnat: broken dispatch tables for interface types ? rodakay
2012-07-08 6:53 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-08 7:38 ` Jeffrey Carter
2012-07-08 8:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-08 12:34 ` rodakay
2012-07-09 6:53 ` rodakay
2012-07-09 7:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2012-07-09 7:46 ` Rod Kay
2012-07-09 9:37 ` Simon Wright
2012-07-09 9:49 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-09 17:32 ` Simon Wright
2012-07-09 18:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-13 15:58 ` Robert A Duff
2012-07-08 17:41 ` Vadim Godunko
2012-07-09 7:34 ` Rod Kay
2012-07-08 23:45 ` sbelmont700
2012-07-10 7:02 ` Rod Kay
2012-07-10 11:09 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox