From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Interfaces and abstract tagged types
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 09:43:47 +0200
Date: 2008-10-05T09:43:49+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1w8x4i0peinwk$.16cenhvch5kv5.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: MrNoSpam-2E36C8.18013105102008@news-server.bigpond.net.au
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 07:01:31 GMT, Dale Stanbrough wrote:
> I was wondering what the magical incantation is to have an abtract
> tagged null record (or abstract tagged private) also implement an
> Interface.
>
> I've tried various combinations reserved words, all without much luck!
type X is limited interface;
type Y is abstract tagged null record;
type Z is abstract new Y and X with null record;
(Interfaces was a huge mistake)
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-05 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-05 7:01 Interfaces and abstract tagged types Dale Stanbrough
2008-10-05 7:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2008-10-05 20:29 ` Robert A Duff
2008-10-06 8:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-10-16 7:51 ` Ivan Levashew
2008-10-16 8:29 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-10-16 9:23 ` Ivan Levashew
2008-10-16 10:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-10-16 10:27 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-10-16 12:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-10-16 13:35 ` Georg Bauhaus
2008-10-16 14:30 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2008-10-23 6:39 ` Ivan Levashew
2008-10-25 8:57 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox