From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Generic Containers in Ada2005
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:33:30 +0100
Date: 2011-02-09T09:33:30+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1vw9tbt1xma5m.cvy6d03i25d1.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: d066a30c-b356-4b28-b713-764c2b895022@d17g2000vbn.googlegroups.com
On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 16:43:49 -0800 (PST), Bryan wrote:
> I'm just curious what the reasoning was behind not providing a Queue
> container? Is there some Ada philosophy behind this?
I think that queue is a too specific container to be included into standard
library. Depending on the number of concurrent peers accessing the queue
ends, whether the queue has fixed size, whether elements are copied or
referenced (e.g. statically allocated elements moved from queue to queue)
the implementation and interface may sufficiently vary.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-09 0:43 Generic Containers in Ada2005 Bryan
2011-02-09 0:57 ` Jeffrey Carter
2011-02-09 1:26 ` Anh Vo
2011-02-09 10:56 ` Simon Wright
2011-02-09 8:33 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2011-02-09 16:01 ` Bryan
2011-02-09 19:10 ` Jeffrey Carter
2011-02-09 20:06 ` Simon Wright
2011-02-09 20:56 ` Maciej Sobczak
2011-02-09 21:22 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-02-10 2:03 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-02-11 7:08 ` Stephen Leake
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox