From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Protected Objects And Many Processors
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 21:35:47 +0100
Date: 2011-01-21T21:35:48+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1shedfqd2b0n9$.ldkhs4t7s9cw$.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: op.vpoa7bc7ule2fv@garhos
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 20:31:49 +0100, Yannick Duch�ne (Hibou57) wrote:
> If you feel there may be a better solution, we first should now what that
> other solution could be (you did not say).
Tasks marshaling parameters. There existed architectures in early 90s,
which used networked massively parallel processors rather than cores. I
mean transputers. Arguably, they came to early and targeted the high end
segment. Most likely they will return, now in the middle and low end of the
scale. Presumably, in a long term perspective, multi-cores will have no
chance to compete with such architectures. Consider 10**2, 10**3, 10**4
processors on one chip.
> You still need a synchronization mechanism, aren't you ?
That depends on the case.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-21 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-21 18:09 Protected Objects And Many Processors Georg Bauhaus
2011-01-21 19:31 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-01-21 20:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2011-01-21 21:48 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-01-21 22:32 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-01-24 11:29 ` comp.lang.php
2011-01-24 14:53 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2011-01-21 19:55 ` Jeffrey Carter
2011-01-21 20:31 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-01-22 5:16 ` Randy Brukardt
2011-02-06 20:04 ` Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)
2011-02-06 1:22 ` Gene
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox