From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: access types
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2007 21:41:05 +0200
Date: 2007-07-01T21:40:21+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ms47w0p7qd6m$.780b4ot5v1q1.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccejjsf9yq.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 10:57:17 -0400, Robert A Duff wrote:
> Access-to-classwide should normally use "all".
> In fact, you won't go too far wrong if you always say "all"
> for all named access-to-variable types.
I appreciate storage pools too much to agree with that. There are so many
interesting things we can do with pools, multiple inheritance for example!
(:-))
I could never understand why explicit conversion is not allowed for
pointers from the same pool.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-01 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-01 0:39 access types Brian May
2007-07-01 1:54 ` Robert A Duff
2007-07-01 7:52 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-07-01 14:57 ` Robert A Duff
2007-07-01 19:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2007-07-02 0:12 ` Robert A Duff
2007-07-02 8:06 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2007-07-02 15:37 ` Adam Beneschan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-07-15 0:00 Access Types Ronald Ayoub
1999-07-21 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-07-22 0:00 ` Steve Folly
1999-07-23 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1998-05-27 0:00 Access types jsanchor
1998-05-28 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk
1998-05-29 0:00 ` jsanchor
1998-05-30 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox