Re: Communications of ACM: Sir, Please Step Away from the ASR-33!

["Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>]

On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 14:55:57 +0100, Georg Bauhaus wrote:

> On 28.12.10 17:26, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> 
>>> OTOH, using a notation that provides for any kind of
>>> message sent will ipso facto express message sending
>>> regardless of implementation (of message sending).
>>> Using source templates controlled by a programmer,
>>> the model can be mapped to a specific implementation
>>> (of message sending).
>> 
>> So simple? No multicast, unicast, acknowledges, QoS, synchronization,
>> routing, balanced load, naming and browsing services,
>> connection/disconnection, marshaling, peers, retries, frames and windows,
>> state transitions.
>> 
>> Send a message - done! Do you really believe in THIS?
> 
> Absolutely.  Understanding the model will not require
> that the model itself provides the fundament of human
> understanding.  Whenever the expression
>     "Send a message - done!"
> answers a question about the functioning of a system,
> then indeed, done!

Then we are living in two different Universes, yours is build of
antimatter. (:-))

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de