From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: little precision about anonymous access types
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 01:23:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2018-05-16T01:23:19-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1fbd0763-bed4-49f5-a1c8-51a634e89eb2@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d294e4a5-864c-4ab0-bf60-6c9a94ace651@googlegroups.com>
I may add, that the craziest thing was to allow the very possibly of using allocators with non-discriminant/non-parameter anonymous access (though I have no idea, and it's not easy to find, where and for how long goes things like values like my_func(new something', ...) types. Their existence, that forbid and uselessness aside, it wouldn't be that much of a loophole. At least provide a way to bind the objects' life time to something, dudes...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-16 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-19 0:37 little precision about anonymous access types Mehdi Saada
2018-03-19 1:08 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-03-19 1:18 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-03-19 14:51 ` AdaMagica
2018-03-19 22:40 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-03-20 17:49 ` G. B.
2018-03-20 23:56 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-03-21 22:46 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-15 0:20 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-15 0:28 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-15 21:48 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-16 8:14 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-16 8:23 ` Mehdi Saada [this message]
2018-05-17 21:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-17 21:17 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-17 21:36 ` J-P. Rosen
2018-05-18 7:44 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-05-15 21:44 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox