comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Subject: Re: Lego Mindstoms for Ada: user group
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-07-08T16:14:24-07:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ee51ea4-da4e-4efc-be12-2015268db888@q11g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 60e6255c-1cf2-45d7-b7ce-3ffc675946f2@t33g2000yqe.googlegroups.com

Matteo Bordin wrote on comp.lang.ada:
> On Jul 8, 3:05 pm, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 8, 2:59 pm, roda...@tpg.com.au wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 8, 10:30 pm, Ludovic Brenta <ludo...@ludovic-brenta.org> wrote:
> > > > Why not use comp.lang.ada and meaningful subject lines like the one
> > > > for this thread?  Is the traffic already too high here?
>
> > >    Heh, the traffic on cla is *never* too high :).
>
> > >    The worry is that the traffic on the formal lego forum may become
> > > too high, and so obscure the purer Ada language questions on cla.
>
> > >    At least, I can live in hope that it will be so ...
>
> > I appreciate your forward thinking but "premature optimization is the
> > root of all evil".  So, I think comp.lang.ada is appropriate until the
> > Lego-related traffic becomes to high.  At that point a new forum will
> > become necessary and justified.  Just my two cents :)
>
> I have to say I still believe a *subgroup* of the LEGO Fan group on
> Linkedin would be the best option. You would have the advantage of
> having a dedicated group which is also visible to other LEGO users
> around the globe, thus providing more visibility to the Ada language,
> to the GNAT-on-MINDSTORMS project and to your discussions. We would
> not have these advantages if the discussion takes place on c.l.a or
> IRC.
>
> I would be happy to start the discussion to create the new subgroup on
> linkedin.

The problems with LinkedIn are its proprietary and centralized nature
and the absence of a search engine.  And it does not allow you to
choose your client, as Usenet does.  Finally, it is a "professional"
network, not necessarily accessible or attractive to teenagers.

Making Ada more visible to the more general Lego Mindstorms is, of
course, a worthy goal.  I therefore suggest the existing Usenet
newsgroup alt.comp.lego-mindstorms as a better solution; in addition
it makes cross-posting to comp.lang.ada possible and even desirable
IMHO.

--
Ludovic Brenta.



  reply	other threads:[~2009-07-08 23:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-07 10:19 Lego Mindstoms for Ada: user group rodakay
2009-07-07 10:27 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2009-07-07 13:51   ` Matteo Bordin
2009-07-07 21:20     ` Martyn Pike
2009-07-08 11:34       ` rodakay
2009-07-08 12:13         ` AdaMagica
2009-07-08 12:30           ` Ludovic Brenta
2009-07-08 12:59             ` rodakay
2009-07-08 13:05               ` Ludovic Brenta
2009-07-08 13:48                 ` rodakay
2009-07-08 13:48                 ` Matteo Bordin
2009-07-08 23:14                   ` Ludovic Brenta [this message]
2009-07-09  8:20                     ` Matteo Bordin
2009-07-09  9:17               ` Stephen Leake
2009-07-09 11:25                 ` rodakay
2009-07-09  9:17             ` Stephen Leake
2009-07-08 12:51           ` rodakay
2009-07-08 13:01             ` Ludovic Brenta
2009-07-08 13:22               ` rodakay
2009-07-08 20:17               ` Pascal Obry
2009-07-09 11:23                 ` rodakay
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox