From: sbelmont700@gmail.com
Subject: Re: access-to-classwide has non-static size?
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 08:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2015-03-27T08:51:42-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c04c8e4-9f68-433f-9283-49ba63f70b34@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lypp7uttf9.fsf@pushface.org>
On Friday, March 27, 2015 at 10:18:51 AM UTC-4, Simon Wright wrote:
>
> I've worked out how to do it at elaboration now:
>
> The_Instance_Events : access Event_Queues.Vector :=
> new Event_Queues.Vector (Capacity => Capacity);
>
> (compiled but not yet executed - more challenges still to overcome!)
Don't forget the 2012 'bounded' vector, which I presume would be acceptable for your situation ("Bounded vector objects should be implemented without implicit pointers or dynamic allocation.")
-sb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-27 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-27 8:26 access-to-classwide has non-static size? Simon Wright
2015-03-27 8:46 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-03-27 8:53 ` Simon Wright
2015-03-27 9:13 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-03-27 14:18 ` Simon Wright
2015-03-27 14:58 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-03-27 15:08 ` Egil H H
2015-03-27 16:51 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-03-27 15:51 ` sbelmont700 [this message]
2015-03-27 21:11 ` Simon Wright
2015-03-27 8:49 ` Simon Wright
2015-03-27 8:53 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox