From: Adam Beneschan <adambeneschan@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Can .ads be compiled alone?
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 07:52:47 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2014-11-17T07:52:47-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1b09d33b-78ef-459a-ba9d-afa62b38d7e9@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wccsihk1dcc.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
On Saturday, November 15, 2014 11:18:52 AM UTC-8, Robert A Duff wrote:
>
> > Not that in GNAT, there are no requirements on compilation order.
> ^^^
> "Note that..."
>
> I hate that typo, because it almost negates the meaning.
> And it's far from the first time I've done it. :-(
The one that bugs me the most is substituting "now" for "not", which also negates the meaning. I've seen this mistake many times (and I'm sure I've done it many times), but I'm not sure why it happens so much, since "w" and "t" aren't next to each other.
-- Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-17 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-07 5:21 Can .ads be compiled alone? moixa
2014-11-07 6:09 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-11-07 17:26 ` Robert A Duff
2014-11-07 17:41 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-11-07 6:20 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-11-07 7:48 ` Chris Moore
2014-11-07 14:54 ` Tero Koskinen
2014-11-07 15:49 ` Björn Lundin
2014-11-07 16:29 ` G.B.
2014-11-08 13:01 ` moixa
2014-11-08 14:55 ` G.B.
2014-11-07 16:29 ` G.B.
2014-11-07 16:44 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-11-07 17:14 ` Shark8
2014-11-08 21:31 ` Chris Moore
2014-11-07 16:50 ` Adam Beneschan
2014-11-07 17:14 ` Robert A Duff
2014-11-08 2:01 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-11-15 12:54 ` rriehle
2014-11-15 19:17 ` Robert A Duff
2014-11-15 19:19 ` Robert A Duff
2014-11-17 15:52 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
2014-11-17 0:07 ` rriehle
2014-11-17 6:50 ` Simon Wright
2014-11-24 3:16 ` rriehle
2014-11-24 6:34 ` Jeffrey Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox