From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: semi-visibility
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 04:11:41 GMT
Date: 2003-06-13T04:11:41+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1acGa.173043$M01.81407@sccrnsc02> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dJbGa.123221$d51.195610@sccrnsc01
>Is there some reason you don't want to put type Visible_To_Relatives in the
>private part of A?
Just that A is already bigger than I'd like.
But I've decided that once again, if Lady Ada slaps my wrist, she's right
and I didn't really want to do that anyway. In this case that means
creating package A.BCD and renaming to A.BCD.C and A.BCD.D, possibly followed
(for less verbosity) by "package A.C renames A.BCD.C;" etc.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-13 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-13 0:25 semi-visibility tmoran
2003-06-13 1:37 ` semi-visibility Jeffrey Carter
2003-06-13 23:08 ` semi-visibility Randy Brukardt
2003-06-13 3:40 ` semi-visibility Steve
2003-06-13 4:11 ` tmoran [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox