From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Does this model work ?
Date: 1999/05/16
Date: 1999-05-16T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1999May16.133923.1@eisner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 373E24C3.D77A6837@easystreet.com
In article <373E24C3.D77A6837@easystreet.com>, Al Christians <achrist@easystreet.com> writes:
> Pascal Obry wrote:
>>
>> I've not use a language yet that it more portable than Ada.
>>
>
> Here's a hypothetical question that I hope you don't think too
> impertinent, and I would be most interested in your learned
> opinion:
>
> How much of the Ada source code available on your web site
> can be expected to run without change on a 64-bit machine,
> under a 64-bit OS, compiled with a 64-bit Ada compiler,
> when all of these become economically available? (within a
> couple of years, I hope)
I am not sure what "economically feasible" means. A DEC Alpha is
a 64-bit machine, and except for those running Windows NT, it has
64-bit operating systems (Linux, Tru64 Unix(nee Digital Unix(nee
DEC OSF/1)), and VMS). The Linux configuration for the new EV6
machine starts at US $ 3500.
Ada compiler prices start at "free".
> If Ada code has a portabilitiy advantage, shouldn't Ada advocates
> be planning to advance the language's status as the world struggles
> with the shift to 64 bit machines over the next few years? (32-bit PC's
> from Intel were on the street in 1987, but 32-bit software only became
> the norm around 1997)
So long as operating systems support both 32-bit and 64-bit
addressing models, there is no particular need to rush change
until a particular application needs 64-bit addressing. The
world should not "struggle" with this one at all.
Larry Kilgallen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-05-16 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-05-14 0:00 Does this model work ? Jean-Marten Marchi
1999-05-14 0:00 ` Al Christians
1999-05-14 0:00 ` Jean-Marten Marchi
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Jean-Marten Marchi
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Roger Racine
1999-05-14 0:00 ` Jean-Marten Marchi
1999-05-15 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
1999-05-15 0:00 ` bglbv
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-16 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-14 0:00 ` dennison
[not found] ` <01be9ee1$eca9be10$022a6282@dieppe>
1999-05-15 0:00 ` Al Christians
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Pascal Obry
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-05-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-20 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Jean-Marten Marchi
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Andi Kleen
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-17 0:00 ` jrcarter001
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-18 0:00 ` dennison
1999-05-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-19 0:00 ` dennison
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Jean-Marten Marchi
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Jean-Marten Marchi
1999-05-17 0:00 ` Jean-Marten Marchi
1999-05-18 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-05-20 0:00 ` Jean-Marten Marchi
1999-05-20 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1999-05-20 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-05-20 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1999-05-20 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-05-18 0:00 ` dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox