From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Compiler implementation of speciallized needs annexes.
Date: 1999/03/01
Date: 1999-03-01T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1999Mar1.142341.1@eisner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7belqo$rl7@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com
In article <7belqo$rl7@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com>, Richard D Riehle <laoXhai@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> Perhaps, in the spirit of the FSF, other compiler publishers
> could simply incorporate the GNAT annexes into their product and
> avoid the duplication associated with more implementations.
Legal issues aside, I believe multiple implementations provide for a
robust Ada climate. Even if an annex item _can_ be implemented in
Ada, some implementation might be able to do "better" with their
own version.
Larry Kilgallen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-03-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-24 0:00 Compiler implementation of speciallized needs annexes Robert T. Sagris
1999-02-24 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-02-24 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-02-25 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-25 0:00 ` JP Thornley
1999-02-25 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-25 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-25 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-26 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1999-03-01 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-03-01 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
1999-03-02 0:00 ` dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox