From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Future of Ada?
Date: 1999/01/13
Date: 1999-01-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1999Jan13.085608.1@eisner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 369c6b78.7488219@news.nodak.edu
In article <369c6b78.7488219@news.nodak.edu>, jamwahl@badlands.nodak.edu (Jim) writes:
> I am just wondering what those who frequent this news group think
> about the future of Ada.
I find that hard to believe.
If you were _really_ interested, you would have gotten the answer already
by going to Deja News and reviewing the responses when this question has
been asked in the past (approximately monthly).
Larry Kilgallen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-01-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-01-13 0:00 Future of Ada? Jim
1999-01-13 0:00 ` Markus Kuhn
[not found] ` <m3iuebji2a.fsf@fred.muc.de>
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Status of GNAT 3.11p Markus Kuhn
1999-01-15 0:00 ` dewar
1999-01-15 0:00 ` dewar
1999-01-16 0:00 ` Future of Ada? Kevin
1999-01-13 0:00 ` David Gillon
1999-01-13 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Jim
1999-01-13 0:00 ` E. Robert Tisdale
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Jeff Schweiger
1999-01-13 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
1999-01-14 0:00 ` Jim
1999-01-13 0:00 ` dennison
1999-01-18 0:00 ` news.oxy.com
1999-01-19 0:00 ` Rush Kester
1999-01-19 0:00 ` Kirk
1999-01-19 0:00 ` Paul Whittington
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox