From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: ada83 or 95?
Date: 1999/02/24
Date: 1999-02-24T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1999Feb24.031134.1@eisner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 36D39A76.FDCAF8A1@GoAway.com
In article <36D39A76.FDCAF8A1@GoAway.com>, Corvus <NoWay@GoAway.com> writes:
> Which Ada should a person that's never used Ada before use? Ada83 or
> Ada95? Is there a big difference, like the difference between C & C++?
There is no big difference for a beginner, particularly if you
just happen to use features that were in Ada83.
There are a few platforms for which only Ada83 compilers are available,
so that is the main reason to restrict yourself to Ada83 features for
new work.
Larry Kilgallen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-24 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-24 0:00 ada83 or 95? Corvus
1999-02-23 0:00 ` Hans Marqvardsen
1999-02-24 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
1999-02-25 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-25 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox