From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: URGENT: year 2000 compliance
Date: 1999/08/24
Date: 1999-08-24T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1999Aug24.083926.1@eisner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 935487077.548895@dedale.pandemonium.fr
In article <935487077.548895@dedale.pandemonium.fr>, "=:-) Vincent" <vincent.brosseau@bruker.fr> writes:
> Does anybody know if GNAT 3.10p is Y2K compliant ?
If you are looking for a vendor to warrant Y2K behavior,
then you need something other than the "p" (public, free,
unsupported) version.
If you just care about "easily discovered bugs" then
the test program offered may be adequate.
Larry Kilgallen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-08-24 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-08-24 0:00 URGENT: year 2000 compliance =:-) Vincent
1999-08-24 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
1999-08-24 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-08-25 0:00 ` Gerald Kasner
1999-08-24 0:00 ` Gerald Kasner
1999-08-24 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-08-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-30 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-08-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox