From: johnherro@aol.com (John Herro)
Subject: Re: Attempting to modify a function result
Date: 1999/07/23
Date: 1999-07-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19990723081132.22914.00000639@ngol05.aol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: yec673cwe0r.fsf@king.cts.com
Keith Thompson <kst@cts.com> writes:
>Looks like a bug in VADS to me.
I tend to agree. I tried the code (adding the missing word TYPE, of
course) on a once-validated Ada 83 compiler (Open Ada) and on GNAT (ver. 3.05,
admittedly not the latest version), and both compilers gave error messages.
Now I admit that trying code on a compiler, even a validated compiler, is
NOT the right way to see if something is legal; the RIGHT way is to study the
LRM. But I thought these data would be interesting, and they tend to confirm
what Keith said.
- John Herro
You can download a shareware AdaTutor program at
http://members.aol.com/AdaTutor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-07-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-07-22 0:00 Attempting to modify a function result Raymond C. Rawa
1999-07-22 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-07-22 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1999-07-23 0:00 ` John Herro [this message]
1999-07-26 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-07-27 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
1999-07-22 0:00 ` Pascal MALAISE
1999-07-23 0:00 ` Raymond C. Rawa
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox