From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: "Classes" as packages in Ada
Date: 1998/11/27
Date: 1998-11-27T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1998Nov27.163943.1@eisner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3UU62.124$8X3.638914@news.rdc1.az.home.com
In article <3UU62.124$8X3.638914@news.rdc1.az.home.com>, "John Goodsen" <jgoodsen@radsoft.com> writes:
> Is it? And that's been my point all along. Any goals of making
> Ada generally acceptable were, IMHO, just paid a bit a lip service
> and now we've got this beautiful, powerful language that scares
> the hell out of people from trying it out. It's a shame.
Certainly it does not scare poeple in general.
It may scare people who are terminally set in their ways.
To the extent that they are scared away, the average quality
of code written in Ada may be enhanced.
Larry Kilgallen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-11-27 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-11-24 0:00 "Classes" as packages in Ada Samuel Mize
1998-11-24 0:00 ` John Goodsen
1998-11-25 0:00 ` Ed Falis
1998-11-25 0:00 ` John Goodsen
1998-11-25 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1998-11-28 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
1998-11-30 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1999-03-28 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-11-27 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
1999-03-28 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox