From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: C/C++ cheaper than Ada?? how? Re: Ada 200X
Date: 1998/07/13
Date: 1998-07-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1998Jul13.192027.1@eisner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.900353937@merv
In article <dewar.900353937@merv>, dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
> As for "don't admit programs which have runtime systems". There is nothing
> about Ada that requires that every Ada program needs a runtime system. Indeed,
> GNAT provides a capability, which we call GNORT (GNAT with No RUntime) that
> does what it says. Allows the compilation of programs with absolutely no
> runtime. Obviously this means that there are restrictions in the subset
> that can be used,
Not so obvious to some of us. Please elaborate.
Larry Kilgallen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-07-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-07-12 0:00 C/C++ cheaper than Ada?? how? Re: Ada 200X Sam Harbaugh, Palm Bay, Florida
1998-07-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-07-13 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
1998-07-14 0:00 ` ak
1998-07-14 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1998-07-14 0:00 ` GNORT Markus Kuhn
1998-07-14 0:00 ` GNORT Robert Dewar
1998-07-13 0:00 ` C/C++ cheaper than Ada?? how? Re: Ada 200X Dr Richard A. O'Keefe
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox