From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Should c.l.ada group split
Date: 1998/12/21
Date: 1998-12-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1998Dec21.174825.1@eisner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 75md0v$n3p$1@plug.news.pipex.net
In article <75md0v$n3p$1@plug.news.pipex.net>, "Mark Fisher" <xuq39@dial.pipex.com> writes:
> After having followed the discussions in this group
> over the past months, I wonder is partitioning
> the newsgroups along the following lines
>
> .83.language
> .83.tools
> .83.tools compilers
> .95.core
> 95.real-time-annex
> .......
> etc
I do not think it would be a good idea:
1. there is not enough traffic
2. there is a high rate of people who would not put their
post in the proper group anyway because they are
not regular participants.
Larry Kilgallen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-12-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-12-21 0:00 Should c.l.ada group split Mark Fisher
1998-12-21 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
1998-12-22 0:00 ` dennison
1998-12-22 0:00 ` dewarr
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox