comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Does ObjectAda optimize at all??
Date: 1998/08/15
Date: 1998-08-15T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1998Aug14.222830.1@eisner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6r2a41$prp$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com

In article <6r2a41$prp$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>, dennison@telepath.com writes:

> However, if ObjectAda doesn't do variable optimization, loop unrolling,
> subprogram inlining, etc., then these folks are right to do this, even though
> they drasticly worsen the maintainability of the code. That is why I think it
> is a disservice to your customers to not provide optimizations, even if they
> never specificly ask for them.

That argument is somewhat weakened in the case at hand, where the
ObjectAda customer base _has_ been asking for many other things,
faster than Aonix can deliver.  To make a judgement that what the
customers have been asking for is "less important" than any other
particular addition gets very subjective.

Larry Kilgallen




  parent reply	other threads:[~1998-08-15  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1998-08-06  0:00 Does ObjectAda optimize at all?? dennison
1998-08-06  0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk
1998-08-07  0:00   ` dennison
1998-08-07  0:00 ` Tarjei Tj�stheim Jensen
1998-08-07  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
1998-08-09  0:00 ` Dave Wood
1998-08-10  0:00   ` dennison
1998-08-14  0:00     ` Tom Moran
1998-08-14  0:00       ` dennison
1998-08-15  0:00         ` Tom Moran
1998-08-14  0:00           ` Steve Doiel
1998-08-15  0:00         ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
1998-08-17  0:00           ` dennison
1998-08-16  0:00         ` Robert Dewar
1998-08-17  0:00           ` dennison
1998-08-16  0:00         ` Tom Moran
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1998-08-22  0:00 dewar
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox