From: csampson@cod.nosc.mil (Charles H. Sampson)
Subject: Re: Elaboration_check For Instantiations
Date: 1997/10/23
Date: 1997-10-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1997Oct23.205254.25272@nosc.mil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1997Oct23.202211.24396@nosc.mil
Sigh. When I said that my sample code was legal in Ada 83, I
thought I saw some loose wording in the LRM that would allow it, al-
though it appeared that the intent was to discourage it, at the least.
Now, however, it seems to be illegal in Ada 83 as well, by 3.9(7).
When I said that it worked in several compilers, I know of at
least three. When I said that a healthy body of code exists using the
"feature", that body includes a large number of packages supplied by an
Ada compiler vendor!
Charlie
--
******
If my user name appears as "csampson", remove the 'c' to get my
correct e-mail address.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-10-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-10-23 0:00 Elaboration_check For Instantiations Charles H. Sampson
1997-10-23 0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson [this message]
1997-10-24 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-10-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-10-27 0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson
1997-10-27 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-10-28 0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson
1997-10-28 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1997-10-28 0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson
1997-10-29 0:00 ` W. Wesley Groleau x4923
1997-10-29 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1997-10-30 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
[not found] ` <345774b3.1434102@santaclara01.news.internex.net>
1997-10-30 0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson
1997-10-30 0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson
1997-10-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-10-29 0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson
1997-10-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-10-27 0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson
1997-10-27 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-10-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox