From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: IDE/Rational Apex
Date: 1997/11/11
Date: 1997-11-11T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1997Nov11.065650.1@eisner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EJGAop.EAK@syd.csa.com.au
In article <EJGAop.EAK@syd.csa.com.au>, damiano@syd.csa.com.au (Damian O'Neill) writes:
> A couple of days ago I requested opinions
> on IDE's in general and Rational Apex in
> particular (thanks again to all responants).
> I was completely underwhelmed by positive
> responses. So if anyone has anything good
> to say about Apex or IDE's in general,
> I'd love to hear it.
I don't intend to pollute comp.lang.ada with my opinions about the
best IDE I have seen, since it has nothing to do with Ada.
As for Apex in particular, please remember that this is Tri-Ada
week and those with Apex experience are off determining whether
the software used to design the Arch was safe :-).
Larry Kilgallen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-11-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-11-10 0:00 IDE/Rational Apex Damian O'Neill
1997-11-11 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
1997-11-11 0:00 ` David Wood
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox