* GNAT vs Borland Speed Test
@ 1997-01-17 0:00 none-set
1997-01-20 0:00 ` Gautier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: none-set @ 1997-01-17 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
There was a posting here lately making light of the runtime
speed of Borland Pascal vs GNAT. I did a little test of
integer math and found that BP beats GNAT by about 4% in
integer math (3N+1 problem using 32-bit ints) when GNAT
is run without optimization. GNAT wins by almost 30% when
option -O2 is on.
Al
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: GNAT vs Borland Speed Test
1997-01-17 0:00 GNAT vs Borland Speed Test none-set
@ 1997-01-20 0:00 ` Gautier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gautier @ 1997-01-20 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
In article <5bmnmh$kdn$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com>, none-set <74031.316@CompuServe.COM> writes:
> There was a posting here lately making light of the runtime
> speed of Borland Pascal vs GNAT. I did a little test of
> integer math and found that BP beats GNAT by about 4% in
> integer math (3N+1 problem using 32-bit ints) when GNAT
> is run without optimization. GNAT wins by almost 30% when
> option -O2 is on.
>
> Al
>
For floating point, a little test with multiplications gave me
about 2 sec. for GNAT, 5 for TP 6.0, 8 for Alsys Ada.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1997-01-20 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1997-01-17 0:00 GNAT vs Borland Speed Test none-set
1997-01-20 0:00 ` Gautier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox