From: Gautier.DeMontmollin@maths.unine.ch (Gautier)
Subject: Re: GNAT vs Borland Speed Test
Date: 1997/01/20
Date: 1997-01-20T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1997Jan20.143206.5577@news> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5bmnmh$kdn$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com
In article <5bmnmh$kdn$1@mhafn.production.compuserve.com>, none-set <74031.316@CompuServe.COM> writes:
> There was a posting here lately making light of the runtime
> speed of Borland Pascal vs GNAT. I did a little test of
> integer math and found that BP beats GNAT by about 4% in
> integer math (3N+1 problem using 32-bit ints) when GNAT
> is run without optimization. GNAT wins by almost 30% when
> option -O2 is on.
>
> Al
>
For floating point, a little test with multiplications gave me
about 2 sec. for GNAT, 5 for TP 6.0, 8 for Alsys Ada.
prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-01-20 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-01-17 0:00 GNAT vs Borland Speed Test none-set
1997-01-20 0:00 ` Gautier [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox