From: wolfmtnrch@aol.com (WolfMtnRch)
Subject: Re: What good is Ada ???
Date: 1997/01/07
Date: 1997-01-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19970107014700.UAA14671@ladder01.news.aol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 32D067C8.3920@etsu-tn.edu
I'd choose ada95, everytime. Especially after reading the Java disclaimer
that came with my new browser. Right up front it clearly states that Java
is not "fault-tolerant". Granted a class is not controlling a missle or
A/C but why would you deliberately choose a language so new to learn with.
Plus, Ada95 has been approved as an international standard. And if that's
not good enough, I know of one Ada95 vender whose compiler will generate
Java.
My Opinion.
John Apa
JTA
********************
The Truth Is Out There,
But Would You Recognize It?
Can You Handle It?
********************
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-01-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-01-04 0:00 What good is Ada ??? Ah Chong
1997-01-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-01-08 0:00 ` Mike Paley
1997-01-04 0:00 ` Why Ada for learning Data Structures (was: What good is Ada ???) Larry Kilgallen
1997-01-04 0:00 ` James Farr
1997-01-04 0:00 ` Robert S. White
1997-01-04 0:00 ` What good is Ada ??? john babrick
1997-01-05 0:00 ` Eric B. Lemings
1997-01-07 0:00 ` WolfMtnRch [this message]
1997-01-07 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
1997-01-08 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1997-01-08 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-01-10 0:00 ` Dale Pontius
1997-01-13 0:00 ` James O'Connor
1997-01-06 0:00 ` Brett M. Kettering
1997-01-08 0:00 ` Mike Paley
1997-01-06 0:00 ` Daniel P Hudson
1997-01-07 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox