From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Retraining from C++ to Ada (was Two Ideas...)
Date: 1996/09/05
Date: 1996-09-05T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1996Sep5.091435.1@eisner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 96090416102641@psavax.pwfl.com
In article <96090416102641@psavax.pwfl.com>, "Marin David Condic, 407.796.8997, M/S 731-93" <condicma@PWFL.COM> writes:
> Now it's the C++ programmers having a hard time trying to write
> "Ada++" Maybe someone needs to write a "Ada for C++ programmers"
> book that does some reeducation?
That is definitely the way the game is played elsewhere in the
industry, and requires not only books but pricey seminars with
flyers delivered to everyone who gets any computer magazine, etc.
Get the "education" companies to feel that they can "sell" some
class seats for retraining programmers from C++ to Ada and they
will do all the advertising Ada ever needed.
Please lets have no backlash from CLA academics regarding Ada 95
being easy enough to be self-taught. Self-taught is a dangerous
approach because it fails to fill peoples brochure piles with
the word Ada !!!
Larry Kilgallen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-09-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-09-04 0:00 Two ideas for the next Ada Standard Marin David Condic, 407.796.8997, M/S 731-93
1996-09-05 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
1996-09-05 0:00 ` Retraining from C++ to Ada (was Two Ideas...) Laurent Guerby
1996-09-06 0:00 ` Two ideas for the next Ada Standard Jon S Anthony
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-09-09 0:00 Retraining from C++ to Ada (was Two Ideas...) Simon Johnston
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox