From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Java vs Ada 95
Date: 1996/10/23
Date: 1996-10-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1996Oct22.214341.1@eisner> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 96102116593631@psavax.pwfl.com
In article <96102116593631@psavax.pwfl.com>, "Marin David Condic, 407.796.8997, M/S 731-93" <condicma@PWFL.COM> writes:
> However, there *might* be some advantage in a language standard to
> saying something to the effect that: "If an implementation
> provides garbage collection, then the following constraints
> apply..." Then outline some minimal set of expected behavior as it
> may apply to program correctness, error detection, exceptional
> conditions or whatever else may be a concern for *language*
> behavior. (If the garbage collection is truly invisible, except
> for performance or space issues, then it doesn't need to be
> specified by the language standard, eh?)
Well the issue of _knowing_ whether the compiler supports GC has been
raised, and there are probably two forms for that:
- ability for a program to specify that gc is expected
- ability for a running program to determine whether gc is present
Larry Kilgallen
prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-10-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-10-21 0:00 Java vs Ada 95 Marin David Condic, 407.796.8997, M/S 731-93
1996-10-23 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox