From: tannen@dudley.geg.mot.com (David Tannen)
Subject: Re: Tasks vs Task Types
Date: 1996/05/08
Date: 1996-05-08T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1996May8.143942.22191@schbbs.mot.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4mnra4$qc6@gde.GDEsystems.COM
In article qc6@gde.GDEsystems.COM, Michael Levasseur <levass@gdesystems.com> writes:
> What is the difference between Tasks and Task Types?
You can instantiate a generic w/ a task type but not with a task 8-).
(Think of the possibilities - link list of tasks <G>).
>
> This relates to Pragma Priority and Size clauses.
But seriously, you have hit on the reason to do task types. If you
need to adjust the size or priority I think the only way you can do
this is w/ a task type. In fact, I am now in the habit of making
all my tasks task types so that I can 'fine tune' the size.
David Tannen (tannen@dudley.geg.mot.com)
Motorola, Scottsdale (602) 675-1074 m/s H1119
Member of TCCCS/Iris, TeamAda, and TeamOS/2
Christian Acronyms: B.I.B.L.E.=Basic Instructions Before Leaving Earth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-05-08 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-05-07 0:00 Tasks vs Task Types Michael Levasseur
1996-05-07 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-05-07 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
1996-05-08 0:00 ` David Tannen [this message]
[not found] <3191319D.2781E494@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
1996-05-10 0:00 ` David Tannen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox