From: Jean-Marie Wallut <Jean-Marie.Wallut@CST.CNES.FR>
Subject: HOOD?
Date: 1996/07/08
Date: 1996-07-08T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <199607080753.JAA20718@imhotep.cst.cnes.fr> (raw)
In our previous message we used "we" because we were two of us writing
(jean-Marie Wallut & Denis Minguillon). We didn't think we were expessing
the opinion of CNES poeple but only our vue as responsible of development
methods.
We agree with John McCabe when he says that the hierarchical aspect can
bring some inefficiency in the resulting code. But we also think that coding
style and performance always need a compromise. This compromise is not the
same depending on the fact that the software to design is an onboard
realtime software with strong constraints or a piece of ground segment.
However the compromise is always possible. One can design a hierarchical
solution and then, making sure he respects it, find some bypasses to enhance
performance (supress parent level for example).
Jean-Marie Wallut & Denis Minguillon
next reply other threads:[~1996-07-08 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-07-08 0:00 Jean-Marie Wallut [this message]
1996-07-08 0:00 ` HOOD? John McCabe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-07-19 0:00 HOOD? Michel.Guyot
1996-07-19 0:00 ` HOOD? Hugh Dunne
1996-07-19 0:00 ` HOOD? John McCabe
1996-07-04 0:00 HOOD? Jean-Marie Wallut
1996-07-04 0:00 ` HOOD? John McCabe
1996-07-08 0:00 ` HOOD? Hugh Dunne
1996-07-08 0:00 ` HOOD? John McCabe
1996-07-02 0:00 HOOD? Franz Kruse
1996-07-02 0:00 ` HOOD? John McCabe
1996-07-04 0:00 ` HOOD? Ian Ward
1996-07-05 0:00 ` HOOD? John McCabe
1996-07-04 0:00 ` HOOD? Jan Wuyts
1996-07-04 0:00 ` HOOD? Ian Ward
1996-07-05 0:00 ` HOOD? John McCabe
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox