type is access cf type is access all?

[fintan@vax.sbu.ac.uk]

trying to get my head around this one and failing!
(Maybe I need a new head?) 

What is the difference between:

   type FooPointers is access Foo;

and

   type FooPointers is access all Foo;

The 9X LRM states 

"if no general_access_modifier {all | constant} appears 
... the access type is a pool-specific access-to_variable 
type"

My reading of this implies that omitting all will result
in variables the access type only being able to designate 
dynamically (new) allocated anonymous variables and not 
non-pool (aliased) variables.

A check of this idea on gnat 2.0 suggests that both types
can designate dynamic and aliased variables.

Anyone know the answer? 

replies by post to me and I will summarise.

fintan

-----------------------------------------------------------

Fintan Culwin PhD
Senior Lecturer Software Engineering
School of Computing
South Bank University
Borough Road
London SE1 0AA

Phone (+44) (0)171 815 7434
Fax   (+44) (0)171 815 7499

fintan@vax.sbu.ac.uk