From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: GNAT function calling overhead
Date: 1995/04/07
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1995Apr7.185622.9614@eisner.decus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: D6nA9u.Hq7@nntpa.cb.att.com
In article <D6nA9u.Hq7@nntpa.cb.att.com>, ka@socrates.hr.att.com (Kenneth Almquist) writes:
> I hope that GNAT funding will cover a bunch of performance tuning, but
> unimplemented features and bug fixing presumably have higher priority
Actually, I would hope GNAT funds would be devoted toward correctness
on the largest possible number of platforms. Then let commercial
vendors sell high-performance compilers to those who need high performance.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-04-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-04-06 0:00 GNAT function calling overhead Duncan Sands
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Colin James III
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Robb Nebbe
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Duncan Sands
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Philip Brashear
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Tom Griest
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Kenneth Almquist
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Colin James III
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Theodore Dennison
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox