From: kilgallen@eisner.decus.org (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Ada Windows compilers
Date: 1995/04/07
Date: 1995-04-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1995Apr7.185334.9613@eisner.decus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 83921.pukite@daina.com
In article <83921.pukite@daina.com>, <pukite@daina.com> writes:
> Eventually I will port to the Windows 3.1 successors with Ada 95; but I
> can't help but laugh at Microsoft's absurd Win 95 certification process.
Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. I don't know the details
of the process, but I have heard that at least one requirement is that
applications be installed _and_removed_ in a standard fashion. That
one feature is very important to a lot of sites, particularly for demo
copies. I am not suggesting you need to be certified, but at least look
at their standards and evaluate their possible value one by one, rather
than discounting them because they came from Microsoft.
Larry Kilgallen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-04-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-04-06 0:00 Ada Windows compilers pukite
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1995-04-04 0:00 casioa
1995-04-05 0:00 ` Ariel Lieberman
1995-04-06 0:00 ` Jim Dorman
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Steve Sivulka
1995-04-07 0:00 ` Bill Hart @ignite
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox