From: whiting_ms@corning.com (whiting_ms@corning.com (Matt Whiting))
Subject: Re: Recommendations on software RFP/RFQs???
Date: 26 Sep 94 08:29:24 -0500
Date: 1994-09-26T08:29:24-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1994Sep26.082924.1@corning.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 35uefe$f26@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM
In article <35uefe$f26@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>, dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller) writes:
> In article <1994Sep23.101801@di.epfl.ch>,
> Magnus Kempe <Magnus.Kempe@di.epfl.ch> wrote:
>>Matt Whiting writes:
>>:
>>: My organization has decided to standardize on C and C++ ...
>>
>>How a company can decide to *standardize* on C++ --a language which is
>>far from being standardized-- is really beyond comprehension. (I mean
>>"beyond" on a cosmic scale.)
>>
--
I used the term "standardize" in the sense that internally my company will use
C and C++ primarily. Nothing regarding the relative standardization of the
respective languages was implied.
Now ... can anyone offer anything relative to my initial inquiry which was
suggestions on good formats, templates or examples for software RFP/RFQs?
Our newsreader was AWOL for a few days and I've missed several posts, hopefully
nothing relative to my inquiry. And, sigh, I've received no email either.
Looks like I get to reinvent another wheel.
--
Matthew S. Whiting, P.E. | PP-ASEL-IA | All opinions expressed herein are
Corning Incorporated | | strictly personal.
whiting_ms@corning.com | |
prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-09-26 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1994Sep21.120129.1@corning.com>
1994-09-23 8:34 ` Recommendations on software RFP/RFQs??? Magnus Kempe
1994-09-23 11:34 ` David Weller
1994-09-26 13:29 ` whiting_ms@corning.com (Matt Whiting) [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox