From: riehler@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu (Richard Riehle)
Subject: Re: 1995 DOD SBIR very barely mentions Ada
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 16:17:53 EDT
Date: 1994-10-11T16:17:53-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1994Oct11.161753.13948@sei.cmu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CxIMHA.5F2@world.std.com
In article <CxIMHA.5F2@world.std.com> srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian) writes:
> Once again, the DoD sends out a clear signal about its apathy towards Ada.
>Yes, it is my review of the annual SBIR program solicitation, the 1995 guide
>which I just received. What follows is a list of 42 of the projects for
>which software is a significant component, AND AGAIN FOR THE N-TH YEAR IN A
>ROW, ADA IS BARELY MENTIONED.
TWIMC:
This is one of those rare instances when Greg is 100% correct.
An Ada preference amendment to the SBIR should be issued immediately
from someone with the right level of authority in the DoD.
Is anyone from the OSD/DoD, listening out there?
Richard Riehle
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-10-11 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-10-11 15:46 1995 DOD SBIR very barely mentions Ada Gregory Aharonian
1994-10-11 20:17 ` Richard Riehle [this message]
1994-10-12 6:49 ` Matt Kennel
1994-10-12 14:24 ` 1995 DOD SBIR very barely mentions Aharonian Ted Dennison
1994-10-13 16:21 ` 1995 DOD SBIR very barely mentions Ada Bill Kinnersley
1994-10-13 19:08 ` Robert Firth
1994-10-14 14:22 ` Norman H. Cohen
1994-10-14 14:22 ` 1995 DOD SBIR very barely mentions ncohen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox