* SIGAda report about OOPSLA (forwarded)
@ 1994-11-03 14:10 David Weller
1994-11-03 14:36 ` Colin James III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Weller @ 1994-11-03 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6382 bytes --]
This is a copy of a report Curtis Bradley send to SIGAda, regarding
how things went at the SIGAda booth at the OOPSLA conference (last
week) in Portland. Posted with permission of the author.
========Message follows=======
========================
Just The Facts...:
========================
o 75 CDROMS were sold during the three exhibiting days
* Tuesday 11 - 7pm
* Wednesday 10 - 5:30pm
* Thursday 9 - 3pm
o Approx. 1/2 - 3/4 of the �Ada Success Stories� were taken. These appeared
to be the items of greatest interest to OOPSLA attendees.
o Almost no Tri-Ada94 Conference & Expo brochures were taken. This appeared
to be the item of least interest to OOPSLA attendees.
o Programming in Ada 9X A Monday afternoon, 1/2 day tutorial, given by
Stephene Barbey, Magnus Kempe & Professor Alfred Strohmier, Swiss Federal
Institute of Technology in Lausanne.
Magnus Kempe reported to me that:
* The tutorial was sold out, i.e. 25 attendees.
* In Magnus' estimation 2/3 of the attendees had worked or were currently
working with Ada
o Magnus Kempe & Dave Weller organized an Ada9X BOF on Wednesday from 12-1pm.
* 16 attendees (excluding Magnus Kempe & Dave Weller).
* An overwhelming majority of the attendees (By show of hands) had worked or
were currently working with Ada.
* Dave reported on his progress in re-implementing the Booch components in
Ada9X.
* All seemed to notice that this conference appeared to be dominated by those
that talked small.
========================
FYI:
========================
o Magnus reported that a woman (Whose name I didnt write down) who gave one of
the highly attended Thursday morning talks went through the exercise of
verbally comparing Ada to C++ and concluded that Ada was hands-down the
winner. Please talk to Magnus or Dave Weller (I believe that he also
attended the talk) for more details.
o Geoffrey Brewingston of BCC Software stopped by the booth and, literally,
pounded his fist on the table to make his point: which was that he loves Ada
but is just too !@#$%^&* expensive! He used to work for one of the large
Aerospace companies and had great success with Ada. When he founded (I
believe) this company (Primary business is imbedded real-time telephony) he
was looking forward to using Ada until he discovered that the per-seat cost
for Ada was over 10X that of C. He therefore could not afford to use Ada and
was forced to use C. He reports the usual horrible integration, porting,
enhancement, and maintenance problems and longs for his Ada days gone by.
However, he still can�t afford the Ada per-seat cost.
o A vendor of a CASE tool (sorry, it was hectic & I didnt get the name of the
tool) stopped by the booth for information about Ada9X. His clients have been
asking about Ada9X and he is planning to generate Ada9X code.
o Dave Weller was wearing an Ada button to incite conversation from other
attendees. Rather than report what he said (Ill probably forget something
important) try to talk to him to get his impressions first hand. He
reportedly engaged quite a few people.
o A few (Less than 10) people were going to purchase the CDROM until they saw
that all the information was available via FTP. They were very pleased to
learn of easy availability of this Ada resource (via FTP) and planned to make
aggressive use of it henceforth.
o One C++ fascist, who had taught one of the tutorials, stopped by the booth and
attempted to lure me into Ada vs. C++ shoot-out. When I refused, by politely
answering his questions and cordially correcting his Ada mis-information
(No, I dont believe that Ada got the idea of Generics from C++ templates...
) he settled down. When I informed him that Ada9X would be a full
Object-Oriented Language and had enhanced its tasking model he seemed
distraught.
o Many who stopped by the booth had used Ada in the distant past and were
pleased to see us there.
========================
IMHO:
========================
o The reception of Ada9X at OOPSLA could best be described as polite
indifference. People werent passionately for or against it, they just didnt
know or care.
o To echo Geoffrey Brewingston of BCC Software the primary obstacle that Ada is
facing is its per-seat cost. The choice of a computer language is seldom,
with the exception of the few remaining DoD contractors, primarily a technical
decision. It is primarily a business decision.
To illustrate my point look at one the most successful computer companies in
history, IBM. IBM did not achieve dominance in the mainframe industry by
selling to the heads of Computer Operation Departments, they sold to CEOs &
Presidents. IBM refers to this as selling to the DMs (Decision Makers).
The DMs decide which Hardware & Software a company will use, not the
technical people. The technical people use the hardware & software that they
are required to use. Additionally, they did not sell Computers, they sold
Business Solutions. I recommend that the Selling of Ada be directed towards
the DMs of the world. The posters that the SIGAda booth had were excellent
in that regard. They focused on the solutions that Ada can provide.
From a business prospective, companies are willing to pay a bit more (50% -
100%) for a *Better* product. However most are not willing or able, with the
exception of the afore mentioned DoD contractors, to spend 500% to 1,000% more
I have no recommendations on getting the compiler vendors to lower the cost of
a Production Quality Ada Development Environment.
If you have any questions/comments about any of this please feel free to
contact me.
-- Curtis
Curtis Bradley
cbradley@abssw.com
Office: 714.447.8905 Absolute Software Co.,Inc.
Main: 213.293.0783 4593 Orchid Drive
FAX: 213.293.6720 Los Angeles, California 90043
--
Proud (and vocal) member of Team Ada! (and Team OS/2) ||This is not your
Ada -- Very Cool. Doesn't Suck. || father's Ada
For all sorts of interesting Ada tidbits, run the command: ||________________
"finger dweller@starbase.neosoft.com | more" (or e-mail with "finger" as subj.)
ObNitPick: Spelling Ada as ADA is like spelling C++ as CPLUSPLUS. :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: SIGAda report about OOPSLA (forwarded)
1994-11-03 14:10 SIGAda report about OOPSLA (forwarded) David Weller
@ 1994-11-03 14:36 ` Colin James III
[not found] ` <39b2kl$4r@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Colin James III @ 1994-11-03 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
Eiffel was not mentioned by the author or postee of the review. As I
understand it, Microsoft's recent public endorsement of Eiffel made
Eiffel, not Ada 9X, the language of interest at the conference. So much
for slanted reporting by conference participants....
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: SIGAda report about OOPSLA (forwarded)
[not found] ` <39b2kl$4r@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
@ 1994-11-03 20:23 ` Robert Firth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert Firth @ 1994-11-03 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
In article <39b2kl$4r@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM> dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller) writes:
>Unless you're a Microsoft Zombie...
Is that really the new name for it? Well, it's a lot
more appropriate than "Chicago", anyway.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1994-11-03 20:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1994-11-03 14:10 SIGAda report about OOPSLA (forwarded) David Weller
1994-11-03 14:36 ` Colin James III
[not found] ` <39b2kl$4r@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
1994-11-03 20:23 ` Robert Firth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox