From: riehler@ajpo.sei.cmu.edu (Richard Riehle)
Subject: Re: Paige's How To Get An Automatic Ada Waiver memo
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 1994 20:40:15 EST
Date: 1994-11-02T20:40:15-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1994Nov2.204015.23113@sei.cmu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EACHUS.94Nov2143819@spectre.mitre.org
In article <EACHUS.94Nov2143819@spectre.mitre.org> eachus@spectre.mitre.org (Robert I. Eachus) writes:
>
> COTS software in the DoD is defined as existing software
>supported by the vendor. If you are willing to support the software
>you sell and warrant that it works now, the DoD could care less what
>language it is written in. Ada is only required if the government has
>to pay to develop the software or maintain it.
Robert,
I wish it were that simple. How do we categorize dBASE IV, Clipper,
FoxPro, etc? My experience with several Navy sites is that they
merrily develop large applications using these tools, and justify
the avoidance of Ada with the rationale that these are COTS products.
And some of these systems are large and complex. And they will/do
require DoD funds for long-term maintenance. One Navy luminary even
affirmed to me at the famous Dual-Use conference that these database
products are indeed regarded as COTS.
Richard Riehle
AdaWorks Software Engineering
Suite 27
2555 Park Boulevard
Palo Alto, CA 94306
(415) 328-1815 FAX 328-1112
email address: adaworks@netcom.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-11-03 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-10-28 14:22 Paige's How To Get An Automatic Ada Waiver memo Gregory Aharonian
1994-11-02 14:38 ` Robert I. Eachus
1994-11-03 1:40 ` Richard Riehle [this message]
1994-11-03 23:10 ` Robert Dewar
1994-11-07 12:55 ` Fred McCall
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox