From: Erik Naggum <erik@naggum.no>
Subject: Re: ISO/IEC DIS 8652 and ISO/IEC DIS 14519-1
Date: 16 Sep 1994 16:41:02 UT
Date: 1994-09-16T16:41:02+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19940916T164102Z.erik@naggum.no> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EMERY.94Sep15084810@goldfinger.mitre.org
[David Emery]
| In short, vote "yes".
thanks for many informative replies! it was obviously right to post here.
I don't, strictly speaking, determine the vote, but will make my
recommendation in line with the unanimous recommendations I have received.
thank you to you all! (and best of luck to ISO/IEC 14519-1!)
#<Erik>
--
Microsoft is not the answer. Microsoft is the question. NO is the answer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-09-16 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-09-15 5:27 ISO/IEC DIS 8652 and ISO/IEC DIS 14519-1 Erik Naggum
1994-09-15 8:48 ` David Emery
1994-09-15 21:16 ` Mats Weber
1994-09-16 16:41 ` Erik Naggum [this message]
1994-09-16 17:23 ` Tucker Taft
1994-09-16 18:03 ` Erik Naggum
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox