comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: aio!usenet@ames.arc.nasa.gov  (John Cobarruvias)
Subject: Re: More DoD use of everything but Ada
Date: 17 Jun 93 15:21:05 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1993Jun17.152105.959@aio.jsc.nasa.gov> (raw)

In article <SRCTRAN.93Jun16161348@world.std.com> srctran@world.std.com
(Gregory Aharonian) writes:
>

I occasionaly read this group. Although at times I agree with Gregs posts,
I still wonder "Whats the point?"

So Greg, Whats the point? OK :
Ada is not being used as widely as Ada proponents believe it is,
Ada has problems
Ada may be dropped by the Air Force
Ada mandate is not right
Ada sucks

OK. now what? If you are trying to convince people that Ada is the root of
all computer evil, try writing your congressman, or someone who can help
you with your quest. But Usenet, especially comp.lang.ada isn't the place.
Maybe we need a new group like comp.lang.ada.complain.

Some of your ravings have merit, but so the hell what? Its beginning to
sound more like sour grapes than anything else.

>   In honor of Mike Feldman's periodic posts of Ada use outside the
>Mandated World, I thought I would start a competing list of non-Ada use
>inside the Mandated world.  If nothing else, this will be a simple
>example of language competition, a concept that escapes the Mandated
world,
>and has shunted Ada into a role as a niche language.  This list in time
>will also beg the question of what Ada is the more cost-effective for.
>
>AIR FORCE DRAIR ADVISER
>   The Air Force at the Oklahoma City Air Logistics Center at Tinker
>Air Force Base has developed the Deficiency Report Analysis Information
>Report (DRAIR), which tracks problem resolution for aircraft parts in the
>field.  It aims to standardize the DRAIR, reduce the time it takes to
>produce a DRAIR, and capture expertise from people knowledgable about
>specific aircraft.
>    DRAIR consists of about 7000 lines of C, 1600 lines of Unix shell
script,
>520 lines of SQL, 143 lines of Unify's RPT Report Writer Language and 603
>CLIPS rules.  CLIPS is a NASA expert shell with many benefits.  Use of AI
>was important to DRAIR.
>
>ARMY TURBINE ENGINE DIAGNOSTICS
>    The Army Research Lab and Ordance Center and School have developed
and
>are fielding (so much for soldiers lives) a lightweight, visual expert
system
>that diagnoses and suggests fixes for M1 tank engines.  TED uses the
expert
>system tool Adept from Symbologic, running under Windows and also using
>Excel and Asymmetrix's Toolbook to provide a graphical object-oriented
system
>that helps mechanics select repair parts.
>
>DARPA FUNDS TEMPORAL REASONING MODELS
>    The July 1993 issue of SIGART (like SIGADA, but for A.I.) Bulletin is
>devoted to temporal reasoning systems, a difficult problem in the field
of
>artificial intelligence.  And like all other advanced research in
computer
>science, none of this work is being done in Ada.  And what work is done,
>much is funded by those zealous defenders of the Ada Mandate, DARPA.
>Here, two DARPA funded efforts are mentioned. One is a system, Tachyon,
>being developed with funding from DARPA through the Air Force's Rome
>Laboratory.  The second is a system written in KRSL for testing temporal
>reasoning systems, funded by the Air Force's Rome Laboratory.
>
>ARMY INTEROPERABILITY NETWORK
>    The June 1993 issue of SIGNAL has an article on the Army CECOM's
>interoperability network, which uses nationwide digital communication
>network and off the shelf equipment to promote inexpensive remote
software
>testing.  It links up support centers at Monmouth, Redstone, Leavenworth,
>and Huachuca, as well as some contractor facilities.
>    The article does not mention which language the system is written in
>(again, why are these people so embarassed to be associated with Ada;
>it desparately needs the publicity), but given the extensive use of
>commercial communications equipment and off-the-shelf products, I would
have
>to assume that the system is Unix based and therefore has lots of C code.
>
>
>DARPA FUNDING OF OOP RESEARCH
>    In examining seven years of OOPSLA conference proceedings
(1986-1992),
>many of the systems developed were funded by government agencies.
>Collectively, DARPA/ONR/CECOM/AFOSR/ESD/ARMY/AIR FORCE funded 24 of 
>these projects - 22 of which were in Lisp/C++/Smalltalk, and 2 in Ada.
>[What is the OOP language of preference for the DoD?   Not Ada.]
>
>==========================================================================
====
>
>Please send any submissions for this list to me by email.  Help me make
>my list longer than Mike's.
>
>-- 
>**************************************************************************

> Greg Aharonian
> Source Translation & Optimization
> P.O. Box 404, Belmont, MA 02178
>




*************************************************************
John R. Cobarruvias, Texas A&M Class of '78, 
NASA Johnson Space Center Houston Tx.
(713)483-9357

"Your pain will be legendary" (Hellraiser I)
"And to think..................I hesitated" (Hellraiser II)
"These pins are killing me!" (Pinhead in Hellraiser IV)
*************************************************************

             reply	other threads:[~1993-06-17 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1993-06-17 15:21 John Cobarruvias [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-06-18 12:59 More DoD use of everything but Ada Mark Bayern
1993-06-17 19:52 cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!cs.utex
1993-06-16 21:50 David Tannen x8273
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox