From: sampson@cod.nosc.mil (Charles H. Sampson)
Subject: Re: Gauntlet gathering rust and dust
Date: 28 Jul 93 15:12:01 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1993Jul28.151201.2028@nosc.mil> (raw)
In article <SRCTRAN.93Jul27201723@world.std.com> srctran@world.std.com (Gregory
Aharonian) writes:
>
>One point though, the larger the amount of classified Ada use, the
>lower the non-defense programming language gross domestic product for
>Ada will be (even lower than my current guess of 2%). So the more Ada
>is actually used inside the DoD, the worse will be its track record
>outside the Mandated world. So this line of arguing actually hurts Ada.
Excuse me? This is an argument that I haven't seen before and I don't
follow it. Could you explain how the classified use of Ada will hurt Ada
for non-defense projects?
Charlie
next reply other threads:[~1993-07-28 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1993-07-28 15:12 Charles H. Sampson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-08-02 15:25 Gauntlet gathering rust and dust agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!csn!news.den.mmc.com!
1993-08-02 13:32 Marcus J. Ranum
1993-07-29 4:09 Gregory Aharonian
1993-07-28 20:34 cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!
1993-07-28 17:53 cis.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!darwin.s
1993-07-28 1:17 Gregory Aharonian
1993-07-27 18:43 agate!howland.reston.ans.net!usc!sdd.hp.com!col.hp.com!csn!news.den.mmc.c
1993-07-27 17:06 sdd.hp.com!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!uchinews!news
1993-07-26 14:35 Tucker Taft
1993-07-23 1:15 dog.ee.lbl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox