comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.i
Subject: Re: Profitability of Ada Educational Sales (was: Ada is not a failure.
Date: 10 Aug 93 15:42:18 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1993Aug10.154218.5848@fcom.cc.utah.edu> (raw)

In article <1993Aug9.145311.25290@sei.cmu.edu> firth@sei.cmu.edu (Robert Firth)
 writes:
>
>However, I'm not sure I agree that NPV is always the correct way to
>cost projects, because it tends to neglect the element of risk present
>in any long-term project.

Not true.  It all depends on how sophisticated your model is.  You can
easily represent increased risk by increasing the cost of capital (i.e.
assuming higher future interest rates.)  You can also limit the number of
years you go out without falling back on break-even analysis.

Although this may have something to do with software project management,
we're getting away from the charter of comp.lang.ada.  If anyone has
further thoughts, let's take it to email.
-- 
Thomas Crook
tcrook@u.cc.utah.edu

             reply	other threads:[~1993-08-10 15:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1993-08-10 15:42 cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.i [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-08-10  2:36 Profitability of Ada Educational Sales (was: Ada is not a failure cis.ohio-state.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!seas.gwu.edu!mfeld
1993-08-09 18:53 magnesium.club.cc.cmu.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!firth
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox