From: jgg@evb.com (John Goodsen)
Subject: Re: Classes vs Tagged Types - Terminology
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1993 15:54:19 GMT
Date: 1993-04-05T15:54:19+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1993Apr5.155419.8598@evb.com> (raw)
In <1993Mar25.155650.16244@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
stt@spock.camb.inmet.com (Tucker Taft) writes:
>
>In Ada 9X, it is only class-wide types (named "T'Class") that provide
>subclass matching.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Didn't you mean "tagged types" :-)
Can we take this as an indicator that you are about ready to
abondon the "tagged type" terminology and adopt the more
appropriate "class type" terminology? It seems that even
members of the 9X project are shying away from using "tagged
type" these days, so why don't just finish the scenario and
adopt the "class type" syntax and terminology ...
fingers crossed...
--
John Goodsen EVB Software Engineering, Inc.
jgg@evb.com - Ada & Object Oriented Training/Products
(301) 695-6960 - Ada GUI & Graphics Tools and Training
- Software Reuse, Process & Environments
next reply other threads:[~1993-04-05 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1993-04-05 15:54 John Goodsen [this message]
1993-04-05 23:04 ` Classes vs Tagged Types - Terminology Mark A Biggar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-04-07 13:49 pipex!uknet!warwick!zaphod.crihan.fr!univ-lyon1.fr!scsing.switch.ch!sicsu
1993-04-06 16:46 mcsun!julienas!newsserver!geant!bruniau
1993-04-06 16:36 Harry Koehnemann
1993-03-22 11:46 Charles Lindsey
1993-03-24 7:42 ` Richard A. O'Keefe
1993-03-25 15:56 ` Tucker Taft
1993-03-26 11:02 ` Stephen J Bevan
1993-03-30 14:34 ` Tucker Taft
1993-03-31 16:21 ` Stephen J Bevan
1993-03-31 20:46 ` Robert I. Eachus
1993-03-24 8:58 ` Robb Nebbe
1993-03-25 0:15 ` David Emery
1993-03-29 9:26 ` Robb Nebbe
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox