From: cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!til de.csc.ti.com!mksol!strohm@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (john r strohm)
Subject: Re: Classes vs types; what's the difference?
Date: 16 Apr 93 14:25:39 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1993Apr16.142539.17969@mksol.dseg.ti.com> (raw)
In article <C5HGHA.9Jq@clw.cs.man.ac.uk> chl@clw.cs.man.ac.uk (Charles Lindsey)
writes:
>Can I remind you that I proposed the reserved word "classified" for this
>purpose some while back. It has a few, but helpful, advantages.
That is probably not a good choice of a reserved word for a language that is
going to be used in DoD applications. "Classified" has a VERY well-known and
VERY long-established meaning in that arena.
next reply other threads:[~1993-04-16 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1993-04-16 14:25 cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!csc.ti.com!til [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-04-15 13:14 Classes vs types; what's the difference? Wes Groleau X7574
1993-04-14 16:58 Charles Lindsey
1993-04-12 15:23 Michael Feldman
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox