From: timbuk.cray.com!hemlock.cray.com!gbt@uunet.uu.net (Greg Titus)
Subject: emacs and Lisp (was: Re: Open Systems closed to Ada?)
Date: 8 Dec 92 17:01:59 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1992Dec8.110200.12179@hemlock.cray.com> (raw)
In article <1992Dec8.093525@eklektix.com> rcd@raven.eklektix.com (Dick Dunn) wr
ites:
>... Interesting
>that so many C programmers use emacs, an editor whose extensibility is
>based on a Lisp programming model.
Neither correction nor refutation, but an off-the-subject
extension of Dick's fine posting on unnecessary linguistic
warring ...
GNU Emacs is Lisp-based, and there may be others as well, but Old
Emacs (analogous to Old English) was TECO-based, whence the emacs
name: Editing MACroS. You executed TECO code in minibuffers,
instead of Lisp code. TECO is definitely a different programming
model! Epsilon Emacs, which I use on my PC at home, is written in
Eel, an extended C. No minibuffers, but it's easy to create new
variables/functions by writing Eel code. There are probably other
languages serving as bases for Emacs as well.
greg
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Titus (gbt@zia.cray.com) Compiler Group (Ada)
Cray Research, Inc. Santa Fe, NM
Opinions expressed herein (such as they are) are purely my own.
reply other threads:[~1992-12-08 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox