comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: agate!spool.mu.edu!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!mars.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu!larry@u cbvax.Berkeley.EDU  (Larry Maturo)
Subject: Re: How badly will C bias in the POSIX standards groups hurt Ada bindi
Date: 11 Dec 92 13:52:03 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1992Dec11.135203.21345@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu> (raw)

In article <1992Dec11.123901.22406@mksol.dseg.ti.com> mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com 
(fred j mccall 575-3539) writes:
>In <62711@mimsy.umd.edu> alex@cs.umd.edu (Alex Blakemore) writes:
>
>>How much do you want to bet that the language independent specification
>>(when it appears in several millenia) looks almost identical to the current
>>C bindings?  That ISO wouldnt dream of having the C bindings change more than
>>a couple of commas so that they dont upset the C POSIX users, but that they
>>wont think twice of asking (nay telling) the Ada community to completely chan
ge
>>our bindings to conform to their views? (after all, they are not the ones who
>>have to use the damn things)
>
>Actually, given that POSIX is based on UNIX and UNIX is built out of
>and around C, I would be surprised if they selected something that is
>too far from C for a specification language.  It's simply a better fit
>for what is being specified.
>
>Personally, I dislike the idea of 'thin' bindings -- all that having
>to cross-reference back and forth seems to amount to throwing a
>roadblock in front of anyone trying to use the Standard.
>
>-- 
>"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
> in the real world."   -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me
.


Actually, I have had the most success with thick binding that have been built o
n
top of thin bindings, no matter what the area of interest.  Given that, maybe
the thin bindings are at least a good starting point.


+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
|                                   |                                        |
| Larry Maturo                      | Opinions expressed herein must be      |
| Tactical Simulation Division      | yours, neither I nor my employer have  |
| Applied Research Laboratories     | any.                                   |
| University of Texas at Austin     |                                        |
| P.O. Box 8029                     +----------------------------------------+
| Austin, Texas 78713-8029          |                                        |
|                                   | When you're as great as I am it's hard |
| larry@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu  | to be modest, but I succeed where      |
|                                   | others fail.                           |
+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+

             reply	other threads:[~1992-12-11 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1992-12-11 13:52 agate!spool.mu.edu!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!mars.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu!larry [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1992-12-11 12:39 How badly will C bias in the POSIX standards groups hurt Ada bindi fred j mccall 575-3539
1992-12-10 16:04 Tucker Taft
1992-12-10 12:13 Jim Lonjers
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox