From: agate!spool.mu.edu!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!mars.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu!larry@u cbvax.Berkeley.EDU (Larry Maturo)
Subject: Re: How badly will C bias in the POSIX standards groups hurt Ada bindi
Date: 11 Dec 92 13:52:03 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1992Dec11.135203.21345@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu> (raw)
In article <1992Dec11.123901.22406@mksol.dseg.ti.com> mccall@mksol.dseg.ti.com
(fred j mccall 575-3539) writes:
>In <62711@mimsy.umd.edu> alex@cs.umd.edu (Alex Blakemore) writes:
>
>>How much do you want to bet that the language independent specification
>>(when it appears in several millenia) looks almost identical to the current
>>C bindings? That ISO wouldnt dream of having the C bindings change more than
>>a couple of commas so that they dont upset the C POSIX users, but that they
>>wont think twice of asking (nay telling) the Ada community to completely chan
ge
>>our bindings to conform to their views? (after all, they are not the ones who
>>have to use the damn things)
>
>Actually, given that POSIX is based on UNIX and UNIX is built out of
>and around C, I would be surprised if they selected something that is
>too far from C for a specification language. It's simply a better fit
>for what is being specified.
>
>Personally, I dislike the idea of 'thin' bindings -- all that having
>to cross-reference back and forth seems to amount to throwing a
>roadblock in front of anyone trying to use the Standard.
>
>--
>"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to live
> in the real world." -- Mary Shafer, NASA Ames Dryden
>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Fred.McCall@dseg.ti.com - I don't speak for others and they don't speak for me
.
Actually, I have had the most success with thick binding that have been built o
n
top of thin bindings, no matter what the area of interest. Given that, maybe
the thin bindings are at least a good starting point.
+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
| | |
| Larry Maturo | Opinions expressed herein must be |
| Tactical Simulation Division | yours, neither I nor my employer have |
| Applied Research Laboratories | any. |
| University of Texas at Austin | |
| P.O. Box 8029 +----------------------------------------+
| Austin, Texas 78713-8029 | |
| | When you're as great as I am it's hard |
| larry@titan.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu | to be modest, but I succeed where |
| | others fail. |
+-----------------------------------+----------------------------------------+
next reply other threads:[~1992-12-11 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1992-12-11 13:52 agate!spool.mu.edu!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!mars.tsd.arlut.utexas.edu!larry [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1992-12-11 12:39 How badly will C bias in the POSIX standards groups hurt Ada bindi fred j mccall 575-3539
1992-12-10 16:04 Tucker Taft
1992-12-10 12:13 Jim Lonjers
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox