From: jls@netcom.COM (Jim Showalter)
Subject: Re: Ada 9X Mapping
Date: 9 May 91 05:55:30 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1991May9.055530.1516@netcom.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 72071@microsoft.UUCP
>James Thiele
>Disclaimer:
>Nobody on this group thinks that a C program written by a great C programmer
>could be better than an Ada programm written by a lousy Ada programmer.
>I do, I know you don't, so don't bother flaming me.
Now now--let's not jump to conclusions. I've seen good C and wretched Ada,
no doubt about it: nobody ever claimed otherwise. What IS claimed is that
if you pull a listing at random from a pile of C programs and a listing
at random from a pile of Ada programs and compare them, the smart money
bet is that the Ada program is better engineered.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1991-05-09 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1991Apr15.144021.12618@aero.org| <jls.671848656@rutabaga>
1991-04-28 21:51 ` Ada 9X Mapping James THIELE
1991-05-09 5:55 ` Jim Showalter [this message]
1991-05-09 18:24 ` Larry M. Jordan
1991-05-09 18:46 ` Ted Grzesik
1991-05-14 23:08 ` Robert I. Eachus
1991-04-15 14:38 byrne
1991-04-17 0:37 ` Jim Showalter
1991-05-22 19:48 ` Ada9X Report to the Public Michele L. Kee
1991-05-22 19:53 ` Air Force's Interpretation of Ada "Cost Effective Policy" Michele L. Kee
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox