comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vanderwerkend@lonexb.radc.af.mil (Dan Vanderwerken)
Subject: Re: DoD Ada Policies
Date: 29 Mar 91 14:01:59 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1991Mar29.140159.1591@lonex.radc.af.mil> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 965@imsl.UUCP

In article <965@imsl.UUCP> lelvis@imsl.UUCP (Gary Lelvis) writes:
>Seeking information on the mandatory requirement for using Ada on DoD
>projects. Realize that the last DoD budget bill contained a clause
>about usage where cost effective. Have the Air Force policy statement.
>Gary Lelvis

I took the Air Force Systems Command's Computer Resource Acquisition Course
last June and we discussed this (at least the Air Force's point of view).
I believe the official policy is:  Ada or Naada (nothing).  Now, this may
be outdated, but I don't think the policy is going to change much.

I'm working the software development portion of a new program now.  The contractor
for the Air Force is using Ada.  If you're developing stuff for DoD usage
under a DoD contract, expect to use Ada.  If you're developing something
like Unix, X-windows, or other Commercial Off-the-Shelf stuff, I'm sure you
can use whatever you want.  My impression is that there is a shortage of
useful Ada implemented tools out there.  Now, this is a possible growth area....

Dan Van Der Werken, Capt, USAF

-- 
Dan Van Der Werken  |  God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that
Rome Laboratory     |  in him we might become the righteousness of God.
(315) 330-3145      |  II Corinthians 5:21  (NIV)

      reply	other threads:[~1991-03-29 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1991-03-20 23:06 DoD Ada Policies Gary Lelvis
1991-03-29 14:01 ` Dan Vanderwerken [this message]
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox