From: hoysch@ucselx.sdsu.edu ( Hoysch)
Subject: Re: Reserve Demobilization System Built Around Reused Ada Code
Date: 5 Jun 91 02:29:00 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1991Jun5.022900.18122@ucselx.sdsu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 15075@encore.Encore.COM
I believe it is possible to have 80% reuse and not just be a rehash.
A sister project to the one I am working on released the first version of their
project that had about the same % of reuse. The project (SMB, mentioned in
AdaIC recent issue and in Ada strategies (the one from the December time frame).
is more than rehash or maintanence because 3 subsystems from 3 other projects
were extracted (w/ some modifications of course) and with a little
new code to come up with the new product. Furthermore, the project that I am
currently working on has (only a approximation) between 50 and 60% reuse, not
counting C code that was converted (and often redesigned for) to Ada (often
not too much savings).
Dan "hoysch" Heuschele
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1991-06-05 2:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1991-05-30 18:30 Reserve Demobilization System Built Around Reused Ada Code Chuck Shotton
1991-06-01 4:23 ` Jim Showalter
1991-06-04 14:59 ` Jerry Callen
1991-06-05 2:29 ` Hoysch [this message]
1991-06-05 13:57 ` John Goodenough
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1991-06-05 18:57 John Goodenough
1991-06-11 6:27 ` Jim Showalter
1991-06-14 17:32 ` Piercarlo Grandi
1991-06-15 0:22 ` Jim Showalter
1991-06-15 23:20 ` Orville R. Weyrich
1991-06-17 17:49 ` brian r hanson x6062
1991-06-18 17:21 ` Bob Munck
1991-05-28 11:02 Chuck Shotton
1991-05-30 0:47 ` Jim Showalter
1991-05-27 16:27 Karl A. Nyberg
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox