From: netcomsv!jls@apple.com (Jim Showalter)
Subject: Re: USE clauses (was: c++ vs ada results)
Date: 6 Jul 91 05:36:41 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1991Jul6.053641.12004@netcom.COM> (raw)
Chuck Shotton describes some problems he has had using the Rational
toolset, and argues that for certain kinds of tasks the Rational is
not the right choice.
Could be.
All I know is that in the four years I worked at Rational I kept
encountering developers, CM people, documentation folks, toolsmiths,
managers, etc who said, in one phrasing or another, "We couldn't have
completed this project without Rational's technology.".
--
*** LIMITLESS SOFTWARE, Inc: Jim Showalter, jls@netcom.com, (408) 243-0630 ****
*Proven solutions to software problems. Consulting and training on all aspects*
*of software development. Management/process/methodology. Architecture/design/*
*reuse. Quality/productivity. Risk reduction. EFFECTIVE OO usage. Ada/C++. *
next reply other threads:[~1991-07-06 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1991-07-06 5:36 Jim Showalter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1991-07-07 22:39 USE clauses (was: c++ vs ada results) Jim Showalter
1991-07-04 18:39 Jim Showalter
1991-07-03 14:11 munck
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox