From: netcomsv!jls@apple.com (Jim Showalter)
Subject: Re: Is CM important? (was: Use pragma I
Date: 17 Jul 91 19:54:16 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1991Jul17.195416.16684@netcom.COM> (raw)
bwhite@inmet.inmet.com writes:
>On Jul 8, 1991, mattel@auto-trol.com writes in response to Showalter's
>bleatings
^^^^^^^^^
[50 lines of dense prose concerning curriculum modifications deleted]
>This has gone on long enough.
I've noticed something about this thread: just about everybody who has
posted to it has ended their post with "Let's stop this thread" or a
similar statement. Yet they don't NOT post to it. It seems to me that
there are a lot of people with a lot of opinions on this subject, all
of whom want everybody ELSE to keep their opinions to themselves. What gives?
--
*** LIMITLESS SOFTWARE, Inc: Jim Showalter, jls@netcom.com, (408) 243-0630 ****
*Proven solutions to software problems. Consulting and training on all aspects*
*of software development. Management/process/methodology. Architecture/design/*
*reuse. Quality/productivity. Risk reduction. EFFECTIVE OO usage. Ada/C++. *
next reply other threads:[~1991-07-17 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1991-07-17 19:54 Jim Showalter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1991-07-20 10:04 Is CM important? (was: Use pragma I George C. Harrison, Norfolk St ate University
1991-07-18 14:03 agate!bionet!uwm.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ub!galileo.cc.rochester.ed
1991-07-17 16:08 Orville R. Weyrich
1991-07-16 15:07 bu.edu!inmet!bwhite
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox